Paralyzed couple home for first time

Home for Christmas

DERBY, Kan. — Chuck Powell inched his wheelchair out of a specially equipped van, guided by his brother-in-law.

His chair made contact with the driveway of his house, and Chuck slowly spun around to see colorful "Welcome Home" banners hanging from the top of the open garage.

Then his wife, Marilyn, backed her electric wheelchair down the van's ramp.They turned to each other and took deep, shaky breaths.

"We're home, honey," Chuck told his best friend of 45 years. "We are home."
They held hands and cried. On Wednesday, the Powells spent the night at home for the first time since a February crash that paralyzed both of them from the chest down.

Feb. 17 was a nice day. The high in Wichita reached 78. Marilyn visited Chuck for lunch at his workplace in Wichita. They decided they'd go for a ride that evening on their 1500 Honda Gold Wing. They left their house between Rose Hill and Derby and rode for a while before heading to Douglass for dinner. Somewhere near Leon, Chuck turned on a paved road. The motorcycle that's taken them on so many fun trips hit a patch of sand put down to prevent winter accidents.

"We don't remember much, but we went off the side of the road," Marilyn said. "That's the last thing we remember until we went to St. Francis." Chuck and Marilyn, both 63, suffered identical spinal cord injuries in the crash. Marilyn also broke her left elbow, both wrists and a hip. Chuck fractured his right wrist and broke his neck, which surgery repaired.

Avid motorcyclists for years, they were wearing full riding gear that night — helmets, boots, gloves, chaps, the works. Their helmets stayed on during the crash. Chuck said they always wore the best helmets money could buy.

Luckily, Marilyn said, someone drove by fairly quickly. Chuck was in a coma for several weeks. When he gained consciousness, he learned he and his wife couldn't walk. "It was a hard thing to hear, that you're paralyzed, but after that settles in, you've got to settle for what you've got," Chuck said. Marilyn remembers when she woke up in an intensive-care unit. She started moving around. She discovered her legs didn't work.

"I wasn't able to talk yet, so I mouthed that I couldn't move," she remembered. "That was scary, when you realize what's happened." But with her husband in the same shape, Marilyn decided, "This is not going to get me down." At a time when many marriages don't last four or five years, let alone 45, Marilyn Powell said, "We've been pretty lucky. We've had a great marriage. We've done of a lot of things together. We work together and play together."

Sharon Archer, the Powells' neighbor for 33 years, said that whenever Chuck and Marilyn went somewhere in their truck, Marilyn would sit as close to her husband as she could, much like she would have dragging Main Street as a teenager. "It's always like they're on their first date," Archer said. "They keep each other going. If they didn't have each other to fight for, I don't think they'd be this strong. She's just a small-town girl who stands by her man."

Marilyn said Chuck felt guilty at first about the accident because he had been driving. But Marilyn told him, "I wanted to go for a ride that night." "Everything you do, you run a risk," she said matter-of-factly.

While Chuck and Marilyn recuperated and learned how to live in wheelchairs, their family, friends and neighbors got to work, too. They made sure the Powells had a ramp to use. They widened doorways, moved furniture so that two people in wheelchairs could get around. They took out a closet to enlarge and remodel the Powells' bathroom, putting in a shower that they can roll into on their chairs.
The bathroom has light blue walls. Marilyn and Chuck saw it for the first time Wednesday.

Friends took off cabinet doors and moved things around in the kitchen so Marilyn and Chuck could reach them. A shop teacher Marilyn worked with at Rose Hill schools made custom wooden tools she can use to open the oven door and the washer and dryer lids. Marilyn's former co-workers at the school's cafeteria cooked up a storm, providing the couple with meals for the near future.
"You ready for this?" friend Ellen Dyer asked Chuck and Marilyn when they arrived home from the hospital, accompanied by Marilyn's sister, Carolyn Foster, and her brother-in-law, Les.

The Dyers travel the country in an RV. They met the Powells years ago through motorcycling and stay at their house for a month or so two times a year. They've tried to pay the Powells for letting them use their land and hook up to utilities, Archer said, but the Powells always have said "no." When the Dyers learned of the accident, they were in Texas. Stan Dyer left for Kansas the next day. The Dyers have paid for much of the materials to make the Powells' home accessible, Archer said. Archer said she and her husband, Craig, have pitched in here and there.

Friends from the Powells' Gold Wing Road Riders group also labored to get the house ready. Marilyn and Chuck said the words "thank you" don't seem enough. "We didn't realize that we had so many friends," Chuck said, breaking down in tears.

The Powells plan to live independently. As they navigate their new lives, a nurse will stop by twice a day, in the morning to help them get out of bed and ready for the day and at night to get ready for bed.

They'll continue with physical therapy. They were excited to be home last week, but they also were nervous about living outside a hospital where the patients are just like them. But Marilyn was proud of something she accomplished on her own the day she came home. "They were going to help me wash my hair today, but I did it myself," she told her friends.

Wanda Russell, a registered nurse at the rehabilitation hospital, helped Marilyn curl her hair. Doing that by herself is one of Marilyn's goals. Staff at the hospital said they didn't remember ever caring for a couple paralyzed from the same spinal cord injuries. "I've been doing this work for 30 years, and it's the first time I've come across it," said case manager Barney Hoss.

Marilyn said Chuck knows what she's gone through, and she understands what he's gone through. They've always been close, she said, but the accident probably has made them even closer.

Their bedroom now is in what was the living room of their house. Two twin hospital beds have been pushed together so the Powells can sleep next to each other. The beds were donated through the hospital by former Wichita State University baseball player Carl Hall, a former Shocker baseball star who was paralyzed in an accident last year.

The staff worked hard to help them get out of the hospital by Christmas, he said.
"I think Chuck said that's the best Christmas present he's ever had," Hoss said. "It's a Christmas present for us, too."

SOURCE: The Republic

Nissan Recalls 28,000 Jukes and 34,000 Sentras for Possible Stalling Problems

In two actions, Nissan is recalling about 62,000 vehicles for stalling problems, the automaker told the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Nissan said that 28,000 Jukes from the 2011 model year were being recalled because a defective weld could allow the turbocharger boost-sensor bracket to break. That could cause an idling engine to stall. Nissan said the engine shouldn’t stall when the vehicle was under way.

The automaker told the safety agency that it first learned of the possible problem in November 2010, but its investigation and monitoring of what it called field data didn’t suggest that a recall was needed until earlier this month.

Meanwhile, almost 34,000 Sentras are being recalled because the zinc coating on the battery-cable harness is thicker than specified. This could cause a voltage drop that could damage the electronic control module, causing the engine to stall and making it impossible to restart, the automaker said.

Nissan told the agency that it began investigating the problem last February and recently concluded that a recall was necessary.

A Nissan spokesman could not be reached to confirm whether either condition had resulted in accidents.

_______________
source: New York Times (Jensen, 12/16)

$36 million settlement closes out lawsuit in NY bus-trailer crash that killed 4 in 2005

ROCHESTER, N.Y. — The owners of a Canadian charter bus and a tractor-trailer are paying $36 million to settle a lawsuit over a 2005 highway collision in western New York that killed four people and injured 19, attorneys said Wednesday.

The settlement with Coach Canada and two Pennsylvania trucking firms heads off a string of trials that were set to begin this month.

The bus was carrying a Canadian youth hockey team from Windsor, Ontario, when it swerved off Interstate 390 about 30 miles south of Rochester and slammed into the truck parked on the side of the highway on Jan. 29, 2005.

Killed were Richard Edwards, 46, who coached the Windsor Wildcats women’s hockey team; his 13-year-old son, Brian; and a third passenger, Catherine Roach, 50. Truck driver Ernest Zeiset Jr., 42, also died.

All the other 19 bus passengers suffered injuries, which ranged from broken bones to brain trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder. They included the coach’s wife, Sheila, and their daughter, Kelly, a player on a team of women ranging in age from 19 to 21.

Two insurers for Coach Canada are paying $22.5 million — almost two-thirds of the settlement — and three insurers for truck operator J & J Hauling Inc. of York Springs, Pa., and trailer owner Verdelli Farms of Harrisburg, Pa., are contributing $13.5 million, said Glenn Pezzulo, an attorney for the tractor and trailer companies.

“There was going to be one trial after another until they were all done,” Pezzulo said, starting with a Dec. 6 trial for Traci Butler, the team’s assistant coach. Court papers noted she suffered a brain injury, broke several bones and became partially deaf.

While police suspected fatigue and inexperience led to the crash, 24-year-old bus driver Ryan Comfort escaped criminal charges. He had driven for the bus company for two months.

Witnesses said he was driving erratically before the crash, but a grand jury declined to indict him. He pleaded guilty to a logbook violation and a traffic violation of failing to stay in the proper lane and was fined $300.

The bus was chartered in Windsor by the hockey team and was traveling to a ski resort when the crash occurred at dusk.

Authorities alleged Comfort lied about the hours he worked in another job during the three days before the crash and failed to report in the driver’s log book that he drove team members around Rochester in the six hours before they embarked on the ski trip. Commercial drivers are required to maintain accurate logs of their work hours and break times.

Comfort told police the bus “acted as though it struck something in the roadway, which caused it to veer to the right. ... I did not fall asleep at the wheel, nor was I influenced by any drugs or alcohol.”

___________
source: Washington Post (AP, 12/14)



Commentary:

18 wheelers and commercial vehicles are dangerous. They are larger than other cars, usually cause more damage and in fact have a different set of laws and rules they must follow.

Considering big companies typically owned these vehicles, these are claims can be hard fought battles. The Cole Legal Group will aggressively pursue justice on your behalf and leave no stone unturned to make sure you receive a settlement or verdict to help rebuild your life.

Let our experience, commitment and drive work to get you the money you deserve to rebuild your life. Our commitment to you: We will not be out worked!

If you, or a loved one, has been injuried in an accident, The Cole Legal Group can help!

Contact us for a FREE CONSULTATION. We are eager to help.

GM says 'couple dozen' Volt owners seek repurchase after fire tests

Crash testing of Chevy Volt

General Motors Co. said Monday a "couple dozen" Chevrolet Volt owners have asked the Detroit automaker to repurchase their extended-range electric vehicles in the face of a federal safety investigation into fires after crash-testing.

GM spokesman Greg Martin said the company was talking to owners about their concerns. He reiterated that the company will buy back the vehicles if customers aren't happy. He also emphasized the Volt is safe.

"Our actions will be guided by our customers' satisfaction," Martin said.

The company is working with Volt owners individually to understand their concerns. GM's preference is to give Volt owners loaner vehicles until the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration completes its investigation.

"We continue to find Volt owners by and large some of the most intensely loyal customers in the industry," Martin said.

"For those few who have requested repurchase, we're going to move fast" if their concerns can't be met any other way, he added.

On May 12, NHTSA crash tested a Chevy Volt in a side-collision impact in Wisconsin. The Volt battery caught fire three weeks later. NHTSA said the fire was caused by damage to the vehicle's lithium-ion battery pack and a coolant line that was ruptured.

As a result of that fire, NHTSA conducted tests on three more Volt battery packs last month at a Defense Department facility in Hampton Roads, Va. The tests intentionally damaged the Volts' lithium-ion battery packs and ruptured the vehicle coolant line.

One of those tests sparked a fire seven days after the test on Thanksgiving. Another of the tests resulted in smoke and sparking that lasted less than a second.

GM and NHTSA both say they have no complaints or reports of fires tied to real-world Volts. NHTSA's preliminary investigation could take six months or more.

More than 230 Volt owners, including former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, have signed an open letter defending the vehicle.

"We are keeping the keys to our Volts. We love our Volts and we feel safe driving our Volts," the owners wrote. "Volt owners feel assured knowing that government and industry are working together to define and communicate this process for electric vehicles, just as they have done for gasoline-powered cars in years past."

_________________
source: Detroit News (Shepardson, 12/5)

An idea to tackle tort reform, defensive medicine in Georgia

It’s been 20 months since the Georgia Supreme Court threw out a key plank of the state’s 2005 tort reform: a $350,000 cap on noneconomic damages for medical malpractice. During that time there’s been some hopeful talk among supporters of the cap, but precious little action by legislators.

Here’s a thought: Why not scrap the medical tort system entirely, saving several billion dollars in the process?

Before every trial lawyer within 200 miles heads for my office, let me explain.

The idea is to replace the current legal system for medical malpractice with an administrative law system that draws heavily on the current arrangement for workers compensation claims.

No more lawsuits, no more juries, no more jackpot justice. Instead, patients injured while undergoing medical treatment would file a no-fault claim. Independent experts then would determine whether there was negligence and, if so, award the patient compensation based on national norms for the type of injury suffered.

The potential results: More patients receiving payments, in a fraction of the time lawsuits take today. Doctors no longer facing the specter of ruinous lawsuits. Even trial lawyers would stand to make more money on the whole.

“Our approach is basically fair compensation — quickly, and more of it,” says Richard L. Jackson, who is pushing this plan through his advocacy group called, well, Patients for Fair Compensation.

The group’s name is straightforward enough, except that Jackson isn’t only or mostly a patient. He’s a longtime health-care executive whose Alpharetta-based medical-staffing company, Jackson Healthcare, employs doctors in all 50 states.

Nor did he come at the issue of tort reform only or mostly from a legal perspective. Rather, his interest is reducing the practice of “defensive medicine” by doctors eager to avoid lawsuits.

During the 2008 presidential primaries, Jackson told me by phone this week, his firm surveyed its doctors about various candidates’ health reform plans. “What happened,” he said, “was we kept hearing the defensive medicine issue being a huge problem. We didn’t ask them about it. It just came out unsolicited.”

Jackson took another survey of 3,000 doctors nationally about “totally unnecessary medicine for the purpose of avoiding a lawsuit.” A whopping 92 percent said they had practiced it in the previous 12 months, and the respondents attributed 34 percent of all health-care costs to defensive medicine.

“I was really caught off-guard by that,” Jackson said.

Last year, he hired Gallup to poll 500 doctors. A similar proportion of them said they practiced defensive medicine, to which they attributed 26 percent of health costs.

Even using that lower estimate, Jackson said, defensive medicine may account for as much as $650 billion in health spending nationally and $13.25 billion in Georgia. That’s roughly $100 a month for every American, or almost 4.5 percent of the U.S. gross domestic product.

Reducing that cost is what sparked Jackson’s interest in medical malpractice reform. But he believes it would be good for patients, too.

“Patients really don’t have access to justice in our [current] system,” Jackson said. If a claim is for less than $150,000, “you can’t find an attorney to represent you. They have to basically go for the big deals. And that’s why they’re so vehemently opposed to caps and those kinds of tort reforms, because it eliminates the ability to go after the big claims so they can fund the other ones.”

Jackson’s group is awaiting a final actuarial study, but he said he is confident that four times as many patients as today will receive some sort of compensation, which, combined, will total two to three times the current sum.

The “extra” money, as well as the funds to operate the new system, would come from existing med-mal insurance premiums, with savings from lowering costs of administration and not having to defend against lawsuits.

The next step will come soon, as Georgia and Florida are the first states where Jackson will try to get legislation passed. I’ll withhold final judgment until there’s an actual bill with actual details. For now, it’s a promising solution to a vexing problem.

____________
source: Atlanta Journal-Constitution (Wingfield, 12/1)